[Charlug] Nagios

[Leam Hall]

Well, their front page says the latest is 3.1.0, the download button on 
the other page says 3.0.6. Not sure they automate their web page.  :)

Unless there's a compelling reason I tend to go for the latest stable. 
In this case I'd suggest 3.x.x so that you're doing evaluations while 
they're working out stuff, you can feed back into their loop about 
issues you see, and when you do install you're on the longer supported 
track.

Few things as bothersome as getting the new product installed, 
configured, tuned, and then having to do a major version upgrade...

Leam

Peter Senft wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Hi @all,
> 
> a question to the Nagios users out there :). I am currently in the
> process evaluating Nagios for our network here and will most likely use
> it. But I am not so sure whether I should use 2.x or 3.x. Any thoughts?
> 
> cu hps
> 
> - --
>                            | Peter Senft
> /"\                        | E-Mail : peter.senft at hpss.de
> \ / ASCII ribbon campaign  | FIDO   : 2:2476/847.34
>  X  against HTML mail      | ICQ    : 62090394
> / \                        | Powered by Debian Linux
>                            | #185651 http://counter.li.org
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
> 
> iD8DBQFJ91DE8C47DFW4ANMRAtkfAJ0UYxKuRZmFVC0HN9d8wvRXlymAWACdG1xb
> sacZNQmt0ygsfNQEmeagHNU=
> =QVxI
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> CharLUG mailing list
> CharLUG at charlug.org
> http://charlug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/charlug
>